Communication Disruption: Specify a vehicle design whose front and rear do not “speak”

Designing a new car is not easy, so car designers put a lot of effort into combining themes and ideas into a single package.

Often it is not only a car designer who fully manages the whole project, but also a group of designers who give their experience to create a beautiful product.

However, sometimes it seems that the people who built the front of the car never even talked to those who made the back, which led to the collapse of the design, which has no theme at all.

One of the best examples of the lack of design compatibility is the 1981 Cadillac Seville “Bustleback”. The car was written by Bill Mitchell, one of GM’s greatest designers. Mitchell was responsible for countless cars in the brand’s portfolio, including the 1963 Buick Riviera and the C2 Corvette race car.

Read more: You hate BMW’s current network, which is better?

The bustleback is an attempt by Cadillac to bring back some Rolls-Royces 1930s style, but they seem to have started drawing it from the back and a third of the way they thought it was a scary idea, then stopped and made it look like an ordinary Cadillac.

As you know, not all car buyers in the 1980s were interested in Rolls-Royce designs before World War II, and the car was as polarized as the difference in styles between front and rear.

Other contenders for the two-sided car design include the second-generation Renault Megane and the BMW Clown Shoe Z3.

So what do you think? Which car do you think looks normal on the front but looks weird on the back?